Tuesday, April 19, 2005

Feel free to copy, there is no copyright on an Anoneumouse montage. (click on image to enlarge)

Mandelson, duplicitous, corrupt, mendacious, treacherous

The duplicitous and mendacious Mandelson, is at his corrupt and treacherous ways again. As reported first on Richard North's Eureferendum blog, and then again this morning under the heading Beyond comprehension It has come to light that Peter Benjamin Mandelson (Crown Steward and Bailiff of the manor of Northstead) was at the centre of a row about secrecy in Brussels last night after he declined to say who hosted a private New Year's holiday he took on the back of an official trip to the Caribbean from Dec 30 to Jan 3.

Mandelson's holiday plans were unexpectedly thrust into the spotlight by a row over open government when the 25 commissioners closed ranks and refused to answer a question about hospitality in a parliamentary question tabled by Nigel Farage, the Ukip MEP.

Commissioners are obliged to report all gifts valued at more than 350 euros. Hospitality was covered by the right to privacy, said Françoise le Bail, the spokesman of the Commission president, Jose Manuel Barroso. There was "a complete difference" between a present or gift from someone a commissioner did not know personally, and hospitality from old friends.

Well we know Geoffrey Robinson, the Ex Paymaster General (report here) and the Hinduja Brothers (report here) are old friends of Mandelson

Mandelson is a traitor, Sack him as a commissioner and send him back here for trial.

In November 2004 Pursuant to Article 213 (2) (ex157(2)) of the treaty establishing the European Community, Peter Benjamin Mandelson; Crown Steward and Bailiff of the manor of Northstead not being a person compelled to do so, took an engagement in the nature of an oath intending to bind the said accused to commit an offence namely treason. He freely gave a solemn Oath before the Court of Justice of the European Union "To perform my duties in complete independence, in the general interests of the communities; in carrying out my duties, neither to seek nor to take instruction from any government or any other body; to refrain from any action incompatible with my duties."

This being treason and misconduct in a public office in direct contradiction to the Oaths he swore as a Member of Parliament for Hartlepool and that, which he swore as a member of Her Majesties Privy Council.

Parliamentary Oath
I ………. swear by Almighty God that I will be faithful and bear true allegiance to Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth, her heirs and successors, according to law. So help me God.

Privy counsellors Oath;

You do swear by Almighty God to be a true and faithful Servant unto The Queen's Majesty as one of Her Majesty's Privy Council. You will not know or understand of any manner of thing to be attempted, done or spoken against Her Majesty's Person, Honour, Crown or Dignity Royal, but you will lett and withstand the same to the uttermost of your power, and either cause it to be revealed to Her Majesty Herself, or to such of Her Privy Council as shall advertise Her Majesty of the same. You will in all things to be moved, treated and debated in Council, faithfully and truly declare your Mind and Opinion, according to your Heart and Conscience; and will keep secret all matters committed and revealed unto you, or that shall be treated of secretly in Council. And if any of the said Treaties or Counsels shall touch any of the Counsellors you will not reveal it unto him but will keep the same until such time as, by the consent of Her Majesty or of the Council, Publication shall be made thereof. You will to your uttermost bear Faith and Allegiance to the Queen's Majesty; and will assist and defend all Jurisdictions, Pre-eminences, and Authorities, granted to Her Majesty and annexed to the Crown by Acts of Parliament, or otherwise, against all Foreign Princes, Persons, Prelates, States, or Potentates. And generally in all things you will do as a faithful and true Servant ought to do to Her Majesty so help you God.

Juramentum est indivisibile, et non est admittendum in parte verum et in parte falsam. (An oath is indivisible; it cannot be in part true and in part false).

Ignorance is no excuse and Halsbury's Laws of England confirms that a breach of Magna Carta is an offence at common law. This provision is the reason why Crown servants take Oaths. The Bill of Right 1689 specifies the form of the oath and the current wording of the parliamentary oath was established in the Promissory Oaths Act 1868.

Archbold, Section 25, dealing with "High Treason". There, the Treason Act 1351 is cited. In Section 25.9, the following is a quotation from the case of Fost.C.L. (183): "High Treason, being an offence committed against the duty of allegiance, it may be proper to consider from whom and to whom allegiance is due. With regard to natural born subjects, there can be no doubt. They owe allegiance to the Crown at all times and in all places natural allegiance is founded on the relation every man standeth in to the Crown considered as the head of that society whereof he is born a member the duty of allegiance ariseth out of it and is inseparably connected with it." The commentary in Archbold continues: "The subjects of the King owe him allegiance".

The offence of misconduct in public office was defined in Russell On Crime, 12th Edition (1964) (J W Cecil Turner) in this way: "Where a public officer is guilty of misbehaviour in office by neglecting a duty imposed upon him either at common law or by statute, he commits a misdemeanour and is liable to indictment unless another remedy is substituted by statute. The liability exists whether he is a common law or a statutory officer; and a person holding an office of important trust and of consequence to the public, under letters patent or derivatively from such authority, is liable to indictment for not faithfully discharging the office."



Post a Comment

<< Home

Listed on BlogShares