<

Wednesday, February 16, 2005

Feel free to copy, there is no copyright on an Anoneumouse montage. (click on image to enlarge)

The UN 1503 Procedure

For those of you who wish to follow up my suggestion in my previous posts HERE and HERE of renouncing EU citizenship. The following concerns the '1503 Procedure' of the UN Commission on Human Rights. Under this procedure, citizens are able to petition the UN Commission on Human Rights, in confidence, if they believe that their human rights are being breached and there are no remedies under domestic law.

As all citizens of EU member states have been made, without any individual choice, citizens of the EU, they are liable to the duties and obligations of EU citizenship.

Indeed, the new EU constitution states under Article I-10:

1. Every national of a Member State shall be a citizen of the Union. Citizenship of the Union shall be additional to national citizenship; it shall not replace it.

2. Citizens of the Union shall enjoy the rights and be subject to the duties provided for in this Constitution.

As the EU itself takes on the role of a state, British nationals are effectively being compelled to become citizens of another country.

If you wish to take up the matter with the UN, I have provided a template that you can adapt. Make sure you check the rules for communications under the '1503 Procedure' Procedure; in particular, you must provide your name, address and date of birth. Anonymous communications will not be accepted.

To the Office of the United Nations, High Commissioner for Human Rights. United Nations Office at Geneva 1211 Geneva 10, Switzerland

I wish the following complaint to be dealt with under the 1503 procedure.

I am unable to exhaust peaceful remedies as the UK Human Rights Act 1998 does not allow me to challenge parliament. (Contravention of article 8 of the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights)

6. - (1) It is unlawful for a public authority to act in a way which is incompatible with a Convention right.

6. - (3) In this section "public authority" includes-
(a) a court or tribunal, and

(b) any person certain of whose functions are functions of a public nature,

but does not include either House of Parliament or a person exercising functions in connection with proceedings in Parliament.

The Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland is attempting to force EU citizenship on me, which is in breach of article 20 (2) of the United Nations Declaration of Human Rights? Article 20. (2) No one may be compelled to belong to an association.

Recently in the UK, we have been faced with two new and highly questionable charters of Human Rights, both of which seek to prohibit discrimination. I am told my 'rights and freedoms are secured without discrimination on any grounds such as…association with a national minority…birth or other status'. Since the UK government has foolishly subscribed to these terms it must abide by them. By attempting to impose an unwanted foreign citizenship on me they are directly breaching my human rights, as defined above. I have a right and freedom to be a subject of the Crown, and to be described as English within the UK. By being described as an EU citizens as well, I am being discriminated against as a member of the English minority in the EU. On these grounds alone, logic would suggest they should now withdraw mine and all other unwanted EU Citizenship and EU passports.

Questions

1. How can the EU (a non-country) claim it can impose citizenship on me without my agreement?


2. Where in law does the state take the right to create the notion that dual-citizenship is somehow compulsory?


3. Where in law does the UK parliament claim sovereignty over my birthrights?


4. Given the terms of the oath sworn by the monarch of the UK at her coronation, and the oaths sworn by her ministers and senior civil servants, how do you or they explain or attempt to justify the present inherent and fundamental contradictions involved?


5. At one stage in the EU's metamorphosis, the issuing of an EU passport was merely a 'recommendation' by the EU. In which case, was citizenship merely a recommendation, too? And is it still?


6. What happens to the legal status of supposed citizenship if and when the EU purports to seize 'legal personality' for itself in the forthcoming European Constitution, after which it can then claim to be a country?


European Constitution
Article I-10: Citizenship of the Union


1. Every national of a Member State shall be a citizen of the Union. Citizenship of the Union shall be additional to national citizenship; it shall not replace it.

2. Citizens of the Union shall enjoy the rights and be subject to the duties provided for in this Constitution.

I do not wish to be a citizen of the associated states of Europe

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

Listed on BlogShares