<

Friday, May 06, 2011

Feel free to copy, there is no copyright on an Anoneumouse montage. (click on image to enlarge)

The Answer to the West Lothian Question



Under international law, the only effect one Independent State can have upon another Independent State is through the obligation and terms of a bi-lateral Treaty. This principle is embodied in Article 27 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties , that states: a “…party may not invoke the provisions of its internal law as justification for its failure to perform a treaty.”

The UK Government draws up on its LEGAL BASIS from Union with Scotland Act 1706 and or the Union with England Act 1707 Article 4 of the Act of Union states: "That all the subjects of the United Kingdom of Great Britain shall from and after the Union………have the same Rights Privileges and Advantages"

However, since devolution the people of England & Scotland, have had different rights, privileges and advantages.

The treaty of union is therefore null and void and England or Scotland can withdraw using the provision of Article 61 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties .

Article 61 Supervening impossibility of performance

A party may invoke the impossibility of performing a treaty as a ground for terminating or withdrawing from it if the impossibility results from the permanent disappearance or destruction of an object indispensable for the execution of the treaty. If the impossibility is temporary, it may be invoked only as a ground for suspending the operation of the treaty.

And that is the Answer to the West Lothian Question.

1 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

I agree, the answer to the West lothian question, is England getting some balls. And declaring what is a fact, that Great Britain is dissolved by breach of treaty. But the greater truth is that GB never existed in law because our treaties are subject to Parliamentary agreement and the English parliament only had limited powers. So by agreeing GB they acted ultra vires and against law 1. By committing treason against the Kingdom of England. 2. By attempting to create an authority greater than the English parliament, which is treason against the country. 3. By attempting to bind our successors.
Since there is no authority in England which can act against the common law, then there is no authority which can agree any treaty to the detriment of the English nation in their country. Supremacy of the nation and salus populi are the highest laws and all authority must be under oath, so as soon as they, being King/Queen in parliament or King/Queen out of parliament violate their oath, their actions are ipso facto null and void, no matter what the Vienna convention states.

1:00 pm  

Post a comment

<< Home

Listed on BlogShares